
Blog
FAA Require Courts to Stay, Not Dismiss, Cases under Section 3, Pending Arbitration
In a significant decision impacting arbitration procedures under federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified the obligations of federal courts when a party seeks to enforce an arbitration agreement. In Smith v. Spizzirri, 601 U.S. 472 (2024), the Court addressed a key procedural question under Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA): whether courts have the discretion to dismiss a case once arbitration has been ordered. The Court’s unanimous ruling provides clarity on a circuit split and reaffirms the statute’s plain language and legislative purpose.
Negotiating Smarter: How to Create Value Without Being Exploited
Rethinking Negotiation Tactics: Why One-Size-Fits-All Strategies Often Fail
Honig on Negotiations
Closely Held Enterprise Disputes Rarely Fit Litigation
Litigation lacks the flexibility and options that a careful, creative, and well-structured dispute resolution process can supply. Read John Hanify’s 10 suggestions for making dispute resolution work.
Advantages of ADR in Workplace Disputes: Earlier the Better
Comparing Types of Conflict Resolution: U.S. vs. Chinese Mediation
Comparing types of conflict resolution: U.S. vs. Chinese mediation
History of Mediation in the US: Democracy as Conflict Resolution
History of mediation in the U.S.
Meet Two Neutrals
Two of our neutrals, Hon. Karen F. Green (Ret.) and Vincent Pisegna, joined Judge Dan Wislow of the "New England Legal Foundation" (NELF) for a discussion about mediation.
Here is the video courtesy of NELF: